Loading...

Fraud Mitigation: Best Practices for the Digital Economy 2.0

by Chris Ryan 4 min read September 19, 2022

two coworkers looking at a computer

External fraud generally results from deceptive activity intended to produce financial gain that is carried out by an individual, a group of people or an entire organization. Fraudsters may prey on any organization or individual, regardless of the size or nature of their activities. The tactics used are becoming increasingly sophisticated, requiring a multilayered fraud mitigation strategy.

Fraud mitigation involves using tools to reduce the frequency or severity of these risks, ultimately protecting the bottom line and the future of the organization.

Fraud impacts the bottom line and so much more

According to the Federal Trade Commission, consumers reported losing more than $10 billion to fraud in 2023, a 14% increase over the previous year and the highest dollar amount ever reported.

These costs extend beyond the face value of the theft to include fees and interest incurred, fines and legal fees, labor and investigation costs and external recovery expenses.

Aside from dollar losses and direct costs, fraud can also pose legal risks that lead to fines and other legal actions and diminish credibility with regulators. Word of deceptive activities can also create risk for the brand and reputation. These factors can, in turn, result in a loss of market confidence, making it difficult to retain clients and engage new business.

Leveraging fraud mitigation best practices

As the future unfolds, three things are fairly certain: 1) The future is likely to bring more technological advances and, thereby, new ways of working and creating. 2) Fraudsters will continue to look for ways to exploit those opportunities. 3) The future is here, today. Organizations that want to remain competitive in the digital economy should make fraud mitigation and prevention an integral part of their operational strategy.

Assess the risk environment

While enhancing revenue opportunities, the global digital economy has increased the complexity of risk management. Be aware of situations that require people to enforce fraud risk policies. While informed, experienced people are powerful resources, it is important to automate routine decisions where you can and leverage people on the most challenging cases.

It is also critical to consider that not every fraud risk aligns directly to losses. Consider touchpoints where information can be exposed that will later be used to commit fraud. Information that crooks attempt to glean from idle chatter during a customer service call can be a source of unexpected vulnerability. These activities can benefit from greater transparency and automated oversight.

Create a tactical plan to prevent and handle fraud

Leverage analytics wherever possible to streamline decisions and choose the right level of friction that’s appropriate for the risk, and palatable for good customers. Consumers and small businesses have come to expect a customized and frictionless experience. Employee productivity, and ultimately revenue growth, requires the ability to operate with speed and informed confidence. A viable fraud mitigation strategy should incorporate these goals seamlessly with operational objectives. If not, prevention and mitigation controls may be sidelined to get legitimate business done, creating inroads for fraudsters.

Look for a partner who can apply the right friction to situations depending on your risk appetite and use existing data (including your internal data and their own data resources) to better identify individual consumers. This identification process can actually smooth the way for known consumers while providing the right protection against fraudsters and giving consumers who are new to your organization a sense of safety and security when logging in for the first time.

It’s equally important that everyone in your organization is working together to prevent fraud. Establish and document best practices and controls, beginning with fostering a workplace culture in which fraud mitigation is part of everyone’s job. Empower and train all staff to identify and report suspicious activity and ensure they know how to raise concerns. Consider implementing ways to encourage open and swift communication, such as anonymous or confidential reporting channels.

Stay vigilant and tap into resources for managing risks

It is likely impossible to think of every threat your organization might face. Instead, think of fraud mitigation as an ongoing process to identify and isolate any suspected fraud fast — before the activity can develop into a major threat to the bottom line — and manage any fallout. Incorporating technology and robust data collection can fortify governance best practices.

Technology can also help you perform the due diligence faster, ensuring compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) and other regulations. As necessary, work with risk assessment consultants to get an objective, experienced view.

Learn more about fraud risk mitigation and fraud prevention services.

Related Posts

For many banks, first-party fraud has become a silent drain on profitability. On paper, it often looks like classic credit risk: an account books, goes delinquent, and ultimately charges off. But a growing share of those early charge-offs is driven by something else entirely: customers who never intended to pay you back. That distinction matters. When first-party fraud is misclassified as credit risk, banks risk overstating credit loss, understating fraud exposure, and missing opportunities to intervene earlier.  In our recent Consumer Banker Association (CBA) partner webinar, “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early,” Experian shared new data and analytics to help fraud, risk and collections leaders see this problem more clearly. This post summarizes key themes from the webinar and points you to the full report and on-demand webinar for deeper insight. Why first-party fraud is a growing issue for banks  Banks are seeing rising early losses, especially in digital channels. But those losses do not always behave like traditional credit deterioration. Several trends are contributing:  More accounts opened and funded digitally  Increased use of synthetic or manipulated identities  Economic pressure on consumers and small businesses  More sophisticated misuse of legitimate credentials  When these patterns are lumped into credit risk, banks can experience:  Inflation of credit loss estimates and reserves  Underinvestment in fraud controls and analytics  Blurred visibility into what is truly driving performance   Treating first-party fraud as a distinct problem is the first step toward solving it.  First-payment default: a clearer view of intent  Traditional credit models are designed to answer, “Can this customer pay?” and “How likely are they to roll into delinquency over time?” They are not designed to answer, “Did this customer ever intend to pay?” To help banks get closer to that question, Experian uses first-payment default (FPD) as a key indicator. At a high level, FPD focuses on accounts that become seriously delinquent early in their lifecycle and do not meaningfully recover.  The principle is straightforward:  A legitimate borrower under stress is more likely to miss payments later, with periods of cure and relapse.  A first-party fraudster is more likely to default quickly and never get back on track.  By focusing on FPD patterns, banks can start to separate cases that look like genuine financial distress from those that are more consistent with deceptive intent.  The full report explains how FPD is defined, how it varies by product, and how it can be used to sharpen bank fraud and credit strategies. Beyond FPD: building a richer fraud signal  FPD alone is not enough to classify first-party fraud. In practice, leading banks are layering FPD with behavioral, application and identity indicators to build a more reliable picture. At a conceptual level, these indicators can include:  Early delinquency and straight-roll behavior  Utilization and credit mix that do not align with stated profile  Unusual income, employment, or application characteristics High-risk channels, devices, or locations at application Patterns of disputes or behaviors that suggest abuse  The power comes from how these signals interact, not from any one data point. The report and webinar walk through how these indicators can be combined into fraud analytics and how they perform across key banking products.  Why it matters across fraud, credit and collections Getting first-party fraud right is not just about fraud loss. It impacts multiple parts of the bank. Fraud strategy Well-defined quantification of first-party fraud helps fraud leaders make the case for investments in identity verification, device intelligence, and other early lifecycle controls, especially in digital account opening and digital lending. Credit risk and capital planning When fraud and credit losses are blended, credit models and reserves can be distorted. Separating first-party fraud provides risk teams a cleaner view of true credit performance and supports better capital planning.  Collections and customer treatment Customers in genuine financial distress need different treatment paths than those who never intended to pay. Better segmentation supports more appropriate outreach, hardship programs, and collections strategies, while reserving firmer actions for abuse.  Executive and board reporting Leadership teams increasingly want to understand what portion of loss is being driven by fraud versus credit. Credible data improves discussions around risk appetite and return on capital.  What leading banks are doing differently  In our work with financial institutions, several common practices have emerged among banks that are getting ahead of first-party fraud: 1. Defining first-party fraud explicitly They establish clear definitions and tracking for first-party fraud across key products instead of leaving it buried in credit loss categories.  2. Embedding FPD segmentation into analytics They use FPD-based views in their monitoring and reporting, particularly in the first 6–12 months on book, to better understand early loss behavior.  3. Unifying fraud and credit decisioning Rather than separate strategies that may conflict, they adopt a more unified decisioning framework that considers both fraud and credit risk when approving accounts, setting limits and managing exposure.  4. Leveraging identity and device data They bring in noncredit data — identity risk, device intelligence, application behavior — to complement traditional credit information and strengthen models.  5. Benchmarking performance against peers They use external benchmarks for first-party fraud loss rates and incident sizes to calibrate their risk posture and investment decisions.  The post is meant as a high-level overview. The real value for your teams will be in the detailed benchmarks, charts and examples in the full report and the discussion in the webinar.  If your teams are asking whether rising early losses are driven by fraud or financial distress, this is the moment to look deeper at first-party fraud.  Download the report: “First-party fraud: The most common culprit”  Explore detailed benchmarks for first-party fraud across banking products, see how first-payment default and other indicators are defined and applied, and review examples you can bring into your own internal discussions.  Download the report Watch the on-demand CBA webinar: “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early”  Hear Experian experts walk through real bank scenarios, FPD analytics and practical steps for integrating first-party fraud intelligence into your fraud, credit, and collections strategies.  Watch the webinar First-party fraud is likely already embedded in your early credit losses. With the right analytics and definitions, banks can uncover the true drivers, reduce hidden fraud exposure, and better support customers facing genuine financial hardship.

by Brittany Ennis 4 min read February 12, 2026

Discover why Experian’s unified fraud prevention platform, backed by decades of data stewardship and AI innovation, is the trusted choice for enterprises seeking scalable, compliant, and transparent identity verification solutions.

by Laura Davis 4 min read December 8, 2025

Learn how you can mitigate e-commerce fraud with identity verification and fraud prevention best practices.

by Theresa Nguyen 4 min read December 3, 2025

Subscribe to our blog

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Experian Insights blog

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe